Site Map | Search Warsailors.com |Merchant Fleet Main Page | Warsailors.com Home |
|
Commodore's report and
Misc. Forum Postings re. the loss of Robert H. Colley
Convoy HX 209
Back to Page 1 - Ships in HX 209 Commodore's Report: Here's what the various sources say about the fate of Robert H. Colley: There seems to be some doubt as to the validity of the claim that this ship was sunk by U-254. What follows is from this thread on my ship forum. The discussion starts with a query by Jan-Olof, Sweden, posted on Dec. 7-2004: - She was part of convoy HX.209 So far there are no problems here except that U 254 made her attack at 14:32 hours on 03.10.42 in AK 5561, i.e. 56N/33W. This information is found in Rohwer and other sources. Lloyd's War Losses, Browning and others place the attack at 16:40 hours on 04.10.42 (a day later) in position 59N/26W (quite some distance from the position reported by U 254). I can't make head or tail of this, hopefully someone else can. Regards Misc. replies to the above query: Hi Jan-Olof, Hello Jan Olof Chief Engineer quoted in Lloyd's War Losses "4th October 1942 at about 4.40 pm (1640) Oct 4th an explosion took place at 6 tank starboard side and ship broke in two. He states that he does not wish to commit himself to saying ship was torpedoed because the explosion was slight". Regards Hello Jan-Olof You are absolutely right in your doubts. It is sure that U-254 has not sunk Robert H Colley on Oct 3rd. We have talked about the documents Prof. Rohwer used for his great work some time ago in an other case. Here he is definately wrong. KTB SKL shows the attack of U-254 the next day, Oct 4th and tells that U-254 sunk an ABANDONED TANKER!!! in AK 5561. Another riddle, what ship? My research in the Robert H. Colley sinking pointed out U-582 as the most probable boat. She sighted HX-209 on Oct 4th at 16.20 h in square AK 36. This is the last sign of life of U-582. There was no other boat as near at Robert H. Colley as U-582. The other possibility would be U-619, but she was too far away. She met U-382 in square AK 33 at the same day. The next day, Oct 5th both boats were sunk by allied aircrafts. I am sure U-582 has to be credited with the sinking of Robert H. Colley. A map is shown here: http://ktb.ubootwaffe.net/RHC.JPG Best regards Hello Brian, David and Roland, Best regards, Jan-Olof Hi Jan-Olof I noticed this discrepancy of the date also and put it on top of my "to-do list" for further research, but I'm currently in my annual military service and have no time for it at the moment. Could you please ask Klaus-Peter for a copy of U-254's KTB? Or does Roland already have a copy? We have to be sure about the attack time and position of this boat. Another thing I noticed: Moore gives as position 59°06N/26°18W, but Browning 59°06N/28°18W Best regards Hello Jan Olof The Robert H Colley wreck was sunk by an escort gunfire in 58.44N 24.54W according to Lloyds War losses. Originally it was torpedoed in postion 59.06N 26.18W. U-582 was sunk 58.52N 21.42W by an USN Catalina from VP.73 Squadron 10.25 5th October. U-619 was sunk 5th Oct 11.53 by an RAF *Catalina from 269 Squadron 58.41N 22.58W. The possible silence from U-582 and U-619 could have been due to considerable air activity or has happened just a few days previous solar activity interfering with communications - a thing that was not that unusual in the North Atlantic as I have experienced.
U-254 did attack a burnt out tanker on the 3rd October but which ship was this. Looking at Prof Rohwer book one has to go back quite a few days to find a tanker that was attacked and it could be the ESSO WILLIAMSBURG. No other tanker is reported as missing according to Lloyds War Losses, nor any freighter with engines aft. The American tanker was attacked as shown by U-211 at 23/0026 CET (22/2206 GMT). According to it's KTB it did not actually see it sink. A search later for survivors and the ship did not find either. A distress signal from a lifeboat was received from a US warship in position 53.10N 41.00W. according to LWL Volume 2. U-211 heard this signal but there was no ship's name. U-211 reported that the ship broke in two. U-211 gave the grid code for its attack as AK7114 which is approximately 53.33N 39.55W. That U-254 attacked a burnt out tanker (but until copy of KTB seen not known if it was a part of a tanker that was attacked) it is not beyond reason that it must have been a loaded tanker that was burnt out and in the North Atlantic must have been east bound. Further as the prevailing winds are westerlies that a hulk could have floated for 11 days is not entirely improbable. David Sibley Here the page of the KTB U 254. Its definitely on october 3, 1942 and the tanker seemed to be abandoned. http://militaria.pohland.com/U 254.tif Will check if I can find some informations about the other boats in this area kpp Hi Klaus-Peter Many thanks for taking the time to post the KTB of U-254. From the description it is clear that the target couldn't be ROBERT H. COLLEY. Most likely attacker is indeed U-582. But which ship was sunk by U-254 then? David suggested ESSO WILLIAMSBURG, but this tanker was seen to break in two completely while U-254 describes the target as abandoned tanker of about 8000 grt with a settled bow and the stern out of the water. Could it be ATHELSULTAN which was torpedoed by U-617 on 23 Sep, 1942? Has someone further details about the loss of this tanker? Best regards Its not U 582 too. U 582 reported on october 10, at 19h07 a convoi and next morning at 4h30 a breakdown of the emitter. If a tanker would have been torpedoed in the afternoon of the 4th, it would have been reported see KTB: http://militaria.pohland.com/U 582.tif and it was not U 619 too, because no indications in her FT's from october 4 and 5 http://militaria.pohland.com/U 619.tif kpp Hi Klaus-Peter Thank you again for your invaluable help. ROBERT H. COLLEY was torpedoed at 16.32 hours local time on 4 October. Hmm.. now I will do some time calculating and someone should please correct me if I am wrong ;) The area in which the tanker was torpedoed lies in GMT + 2h Only a thought of me: Could it be that U-582 tried to send a success report but problems with the radio prevented this? Well, I see three possibilities: Best regards Hello Rainer, Regarding U-254 this boat reported attacking a burnt out tanker with the forepart awash, and the after section above the surface, with a lifeboat in the falls hanging down. This could not have been the ATHELSULTAN, as had been suggested because she sank stern first and the Master who was in the water saw her go. U-211 did not see the ESSO WILLIAMSBURG sink, she saw her break in two with the parts drifting. I have conducted an exercise from the reported position of U-211 and the reported position of U254 some 11 days later a time span of 254 hours. The position of U-211 ak7114 = 53.33n 39.55w approximately, and U-254 ak5561 = 55.09n 32.55w. a rhumb line distance of 263 miles and the course of drift for a derelict 68.6º which somewhat east of north east. I put it to you that the prevailing winds in the North Atlantic are from the west or either side of it, that is not unreasonable to think a derelict if it's hull has some buoyancy it could have drifted this distance in the time span which calls for just over 1 knot helped by the winds to push in the direction indicated. However until I do more research on HX.209 at PRO the matter rests. Kind Regards Here is the operation chard from october 2 to ctober 6, 1942. I have checked all the KTB's of the mentioned boats, no one they all where in the vicinity, tried to attack the convoy, but no one reported an attack. All boats which were in good attack position were forced to dive and to avoid the surrounding destroyers. http://militaria.pohland.com/karte3-4.10.42.tif kpp Additionally, I've received the following E-mail from George Reed, who was on board Taranaki at the time: "I would like to add to the discussions that have taken place re the sinking of the Robert H Colley in Convoy HX 209. I was a 20 year old seaman sailing on the MV Taranaki in Convoy HX 209 when I witnessed the Robert H Colley break in two. The seas when this tragedy took place were absolutely mountainous, I estimated that they were of a vertical height of about 80 feet - one of the few times when I felt somewhat scared during my seafaring carrer. I note that Commodore Magee wrote that the "Robert H Colley broke in two in heavy sea" and I could not agree with him more. There was no visible explosion such as one would expect from a torpedo strike. I cannot imagine that under those circumstances a submarine could or would attempt any kind of action, except to avoid such mountainous seas - it would have been absolutely suicidal - there is no way a submarine captain could have controled his craft. Indeed, I well remember that we were in a sense grateful that the prevailing conditions prevented any kind of submarine operating there." If anyone sailed with George Reed and would like to contact him, I'd be happy to pass on his E-mail address - my address has been provided at the bottom of this page. He later joined Akaroa, and has also told me about a voyage with this ship as follows:
To the next HX convoy in my list HX 210 |
Site Map | Search Warsailors.com |Merchant Fleet Main Page | Warsailors.com Home |