"At 2:40 PM BST on October 17th in Lat 60 23N Long 16 28W the above vessel (meaning Uskbridge) was struck by torpedo on starboard side in region of the bridge. Being almost directly in line astern of Uskbridge and a rear ship I stopped to pick up survivors. Boat was lowered, one man picked out of the water and five others taken on board from one of the Uskbridge's own boats, making six in all. The SS Katwijk also stopped and took on board 21 survivors from another Uskbridge boat. Having satisfied myself there were no other survivors, I proceeded at 5 AM BST to rejoin convoy.

SS Uskbridge appeared very badly damaged on starboard side but had not sunk when we proceeded although appeared to be settling by the head. I took up position in convoy at 9:30 AM BST and immediately reported to Commodore as above".

–––––––––––––––––––––––

I also have in my possession a document containing a report from Captain L. Wulp of the Dutch Bussum. The accompanying cover letter, dated Montreal, Oct. 31 and signed by Lt. Commander F. H. Davis, Naval Control Service Officer, mentions Bussum, in addition to Dokka and Montreal City, so I suspect Bussum may also have been in Convoy OB 228(?). An attachment to this report states that there were no other vessels in site, but this makes sense, because OB 228 had been dispersed by this time. Having said that, it's also possible that Bussum could have been in Convoy OB 229? I say this, because the only attack mentioned in "Allied Submarine Successes of World War Two" by Jürgen Rohwer, that fits with Captain Wulp's details, is an attack made by the Italian Submarine Malaspina on an unnamed vessel on Oct. 20-1940; position given by the sub in this book is 59N 29W, and the vessel, which has been given 8000 gt (larger than Bussum, which was 3636 gt) is said to have been a romper from Convoy OB 229. But then again, this convoy had left Liverpool on Oct. 15 with 35 ships, dispersed on the 18th, and this departure date does not match up as well with the departure date (from South Shields) given for Bussum, namely Oct. 11-1940.

Going to the page about Malaspina on the website about Italian submarines, which I've linked to at the end of this text, I find the following:
"The night of the 20th (Oct.-1940), the Malaspina attacked a ship of about 3,400 t. The first torpedo was deflected by the waves, and of a second launch of three torpedoes, one reached the target. The Malaspina began firing with the deck gun, but it soon had to interrupt due to the darkness of the night, which did not allow the crew to locate their hits, while it gave the ship, which had the advantage of better stability and a higher position, the possibility of closing their hits to the cunning tower. Contact with the merchant ship, lost after a heavy squall, was later never re-established".

This then, in my opinion, combined with the position given by Captain Wulp, fits with the details in his report (but it still does not tell us which convoy Bussum had been in).

Names of escorts for Convoy OB 228 are unavailable to me, but HMS Folkestone is mentioned in my report about Dokka. Uboat.net also mentions HMS Sphene (in connection with the loss of Bonheur) and HMS Hibiscus (in connection with the loss of Sandsend).